Critically evaluate theories of nationalism and its relationship with Essay - 1

Critically evaluate theories of nationalism and its affinity with racism - Essay ExampleAround atomic number 63, the Napoleonic armies who not only idealized it but to a fault provoked nationalist reactions through their conquests spread the idea of the legitimacy of the nation as opposed to kingdom. disdain the restoration of traditional monarchs after napoleons defeat, the seeds of idea had already been sowed all over europium and the next 50 years it precipitated outbreaks of violence in support for popular nationalism. There are deuce main theories that explain nationalism the perennialists who argue that nations, natural or otherwise owe their existence to the accompaniment that humans have always lived in societies posit the first. The natural part is inspired by the item that more nationalist legitimize their nations as natural by virtue of the fact that they have been in existence for centuries. The position of perennialists is that nationalism can be traced to cultura l characteristics and the nature of the human landscape with passim their particular histories this takes to consideration every factor including those that are purely symbolic or even mythical. This telephone line was based on the existence of a number of large ethnic communities especially during the dark and plaza ages that used the term nation to describe themselves. In this paper, the relationship between nationalism and racism bequeath be examined with focus on the perennialist and modernist theories of nationalism as well as the economic impacts and perception of two concepts on word nations. Racial consideration of nationalism was applied to ancient communities and civilizations such as the Egyptians Chinese, Indians and legion(predicate) others, under the perennial perception on nationalism the terms nation and race were interchangeable. Even subsequent nations such as the British, German, and American were seen as races this implied that the social political communit y was inherently tied up to a biological exclusiveness that was believed to transcend individuals in the different races. This perception was and still is conducive anchor for the justification or racism and other forms of xenophobia such as Aryan supremacy communities, especially financially powerful ones used the notion to discriminate others. Racism is loosely defined as the doctrine that assumes near races are superior to others in term of physical intellectual or moral and other aspects justifying full to dominate other lesser races and treat them in an undignified and unequal manner (Smith 1983). For instance, in Europe during the Elizabethan age, individuals of Jewish origin were openly discriminated even by the law Jews were not allowed to engage in the convectional business activity. From such legal restrictions, popular stereotypes such as those of Jewish shylocks emerged, not because they were naturally predisposed to such activity but because they were compelled by l egal restriction to practice usury. This is disdain the fact that many Jews were born and grew up in Europe amongst the French and Italians, for instance, by modern consideration such muckle would have been considered European nationals. However, the assumption them was that one would always remain of the nation, in this case race, which they were born despite cultural and geopolitical translocation. Centuries later when such notions had been discounted by most of the